WARNING: THIS BLOG CONTAINS VIGILANTE SPOILERS.
Many readers didn't see this first note because they skipped over chapter 3. More than half.
1/4 - Chapter 03 --- MSG HEIST ---
I'm going to try this author's note blog post to see if it flies. Every few chapters, I might add notes. Sometimes I have these ideas, but they don't pan out. At least for chapter three, I have something to say.
I gave you three chapters in three days to get readers past the world-building and scene-setting and into the meat of the story. That will not happen again.
That slog of a scene that opened the story concerned me. I hope it wasn't too much politics. It was necessary to get that out of the way, the big picture backstory, so I could move on with the news reporting and crime-fighting story. I did that political information dump in a scene and conversation to have multiple voices and points of view rather than a narrator explaining the mess we're in. If there was one aspect of this writing I struggled with from the start, it was long narrative passages. I did the same with the dinner scene with Mom and Dad. I much prefer my characters telling the tale in their voices.
I'm not a world builder aside from developing characters of a time. I write in the real world, using places like New York and LA because everyone knows them well enough, and I don't have to create a world. I simply choose a period, the 1970s, the 1990s, and now 2035.
The thing about writing in the future, even the near future, is that I must do some world-building to explain the years ahead to bridge the gap to 2035. I converted some of these long narrator-driven passages into scenes, but several remain. I had to build a vigilante world with a history, and that requires explaining.
The political angle is always present, but I keep it as a side story, something my characters bitch about or try to ignore, as we all do. Now that Aiden knows there's a new vigilante, we get into the real story. It's about crime, heroism, civic duty, and corruption. As a journalist and a citizen, Aiden must make hard choices as he's drawn closer to the action.
If you find Aiden's choices disagreeable, or you believe the crusader is wrong in his mission and execution, that's okay. I'm cool with that. I am writing to create a social/moral dilemma that will have people on both sides.
And now, as of this weekend, real-world events have me making minor changes to my story. When you see how I weave a little Venezuela into this, you'll see how nicely it fits.
1/14 - Chapter 08 --- BLUE SKY ---
I finally completed the rewrite this week. When I opened Sacred Heart on December 20th, there were 20 chapters. My plan was a light rewrite, coloring here and there. That's not what happened. The novel is now 25 chapters. Not only that, the average chapter was 5500 words, typical of my detective writing, tighter with fewer side stories. Now, the average is maybe 6300. Adding 800 words per chapter, plus five full chapters, is a major rewrite. I can tell you where a lot of those words are, Blue Sky.
In the original story, drones were in four scenes, just a casual mention, and then one major event that comes later. I decided to dial up the techie side of future policing as a way of giving my story cops to relate to, not bad cops, but maybe this Blue Sky program is a little sketchy. Every mention of Blue Sky, every drone-cop character, the air stations, and every drone scene involving the Blue Sky team were written and woven into the old story. That's a big fucking job.
When you rewrite, weaving in new characters and events, they affect other characters and events. You must comb the story for any references or facts that must be changed to align with the new writing. That is the biggest pitfall of a major overhaul: it's easy to miss a few nuts and bolts. My work is not 100% complete.
I had multiple endings to this story, dark and light. I finally deleted one. I have two versions of the climactic crime scene, each a full chapter and a different perspective. I decided to use both, not woven, back-to-back. I'm pleased with how that reads.
--- BEWARE: WALLS OF TEXT AHEAD ---
Aiden lives a solitary life in some ways, but he also has secrets he cannot share with his people. The crusader leads a solitary life, lurking in the shadows. There are many scenes, most of a chapter in some cases, where they are in a struggle of solitude, and there's no dialogue.
Walls of text narrative is not my favorite style of writing or reading. World-building requires narrative, as does lone-wolf storytelling. I like the writing. I'm rolling with it. You've been warned. I know if you don't like it, you'll just skip it. The evidence is in the numbers.
Until next time.
1/22 - Chapter 12 --- BLOODSHED & MAYHEM ---
The MTA Train Yard shootout is my over-the-top, violent action scene I could imagine being in a stupid Hollywood action movie, the cannon booms, blood mist, and missing limbs, human remains in heaps. Because I wrote this scene, a reader might believe I'm into that genre. I am not, but I wanted to go all-in on Sacred Heart. If I'm going to write a crime-action drama with a body count, don't sanitize it with a PG rating.
I will confess that it's fun to write, with a close eye on the reality and credibility of the action. Is it believable? The firefight on Pier 98 was straightforward enough. The MTA yard raised the ante, far more bloodshed with roughly the same body count. Is it plausible? That's my number one metric.
What I loathe most about most Hollywood action films is the abandoning of reality, logic, and the laws of physics and nature. The action is simply not believable. This is a challenge in future scenes of bloodshed and mayhem. I rewrote the ending of this novel because there were reality gaps I could not abide.
At one point, the MTA drone scene was the only drone scene in this story. Officer Crockett is an original character; how he died was rewritten, with me adding his doofus heroism. When the idea of Crockett finding that prayer card and then dying minutes later struck me, that was an epiphany moment. Yes!
Back to believability. There's a larger conspiracy Sacred Heart is trying to uncover. Is it plausible? In the context of today's politics, from which this tale is based, I believe it's not only credible, but we know there are extremists who think this way. Going down the rabbit holes of political conspiracies is risky, but as long as I maintain a plausible, logical storyline, as I try to do with the action scenes, I think I can pull it off.
More mayhem to come.
1/28 - Chapter 15 --- GOOGLE STREET SCENES ---
When I'm creating a crime scene, I'm not describing a fictitious New York street. I Google Maps my way through unfamiliar intersections, using Street View to locate subway entrances and other neighborhood features. I put my action at that scene, and describe the street as it is.
In his mad station-to-station run in Fordham Heights, I drove the route through the four-story narrow canyon right up to the Green Line stairs at the bodega. That's how I learned the #4 train was elevated in the Bronx, and I had to rewrite the action that came afterwards, which was complete and now in the trash. In the end, I enjoyed getting my story out of the subway tunnels. I hope that action sequence was believable.
I have ridden the MTA many times, but I don't know it all because I've never lived in New York. From All The Young Punks to Sacred Heart, I have learned the New York subway system. Google Maps has everything. Click on an MTA station, and you get a photo of the platform and which trains stop there. I have taken what I have gathered and created this possible future, with the subway system as a character as much as a setting.
I like using locations in the city I know from my visits, but that's only a small fraction of all the locations I use. I have never been to Harlem. The corner building that was blown up at Marcus Garvey is described as it is today. The stoops along the street where witnesses told their version of the gunfight are real, as they are all over New York. I enjoy keeping it real as much as I can in fiction.
I always have bumbling cops and lucky breaks for my hero, Hollywood tropes, but there will be no magic tricks or super powers in my action writing. Like Ironman and Batman, my comic book hero must be tech-based. Even then, every tool and weapon Sacred Heart deploys is real, no Batcycles, just a Kawasaki.
Based on the numbers, I'd guess there are a dozen or more readers staying with me on this story. The chapter-to-chapter views are erratic, but seem to be settling in the teens. Woohoo! This is nothing like my punk writing, so I understand.
--- PBS DOCS ---
I have not been writing much, not a slump, just a break. I have the PBS add-on for Amazon Prime, the best five bucks a month I ever spent. Since Christmas, I have watched the American Revolution three times. That's a six part ten hour series. I'm a huge Ken Burns fan. I watched The Civil War again, for like the sixth time. I then watched The West, for the second time, and Lewis and Clark for the first time.
I'm certain there will be some historical fiction writing in my future. I'm creating my characters and their backstories, tied to actual history. Later, I'll put them in a tale of adventure. I'm considering writing them as anti-heroes, not always the good guys, creating moral ambiguity on the frontier. That's all I have, PBS documentaries and the seed of a late 18th-century novel.
I joke about old men all the time because I've known them my entire life, and I've turned into one. I have the documentary gene; history, all the wars, space, rock and roll docs, science, nature, and I can binge like a champion. Netflix has some good, not cheesy, docudramas; The Ottomans is a standout, and the siege of Constantinople is fascinating.
Hey, it's my blog. I write what I want.
Back to crime and mayhem.
